“Evicted” by Blandford Fletcher

"Evicted" by Blandford Fletcher, Oil on canvas. Photo taken thanks to Brisbane Art Gallery, South Bank, Brisbane, Queensland.

“Evicted” by Blandford Fletcher, 1887 Oil on canvas. Photo taken thanks to Queensland Art Gallery, South Bank, Brisbane, Queensland.

Each visit to the Queensland Art Gallery sees me inexorably drawn to “Evicted” by Blandford Fletcher (1858 -1936). I question why this should be. Is it that this painting from 1887 reminds me of my past life living in English villages, thus stirring emotive memories? Is it that it brings me closer to my ancestors who lived in Britain and would have dressed like this and known the world that it portrays?

Detail of "Evicted"

Detail of “Evicted”

What I have no need to question is that it attracts me because it is Beautiful Stuff, masterfully executed by a man who could draw, who understood composition, use of colour and whose immense skill with his chosen medium is undeniable. The subject matter does not attract me as it shows a sad widow and her daughter being evicted from their home in Steventon in Berkshire by the Bailiff with villagers looking on. I wondered why I should like the painting so much when the subject was so tragic. I also wondered why every face had such blandness of expression under the circumstances but concluded that this must be a reflection of the times when to portray high emotion may have appeared almost “cartoony”. Perhaps the artist wished to give the victims dignity and also to not point the finger of blame at the others. In a cruel system all are ultimately victims I suppose. But that is conjecture. On my last visit to the painting I was unconvinced by the above conclusions as I felt that the full reason for its fascination  still eluded me. I read the information plaque again and I then understood. ‘….Fletcher’s interests lay less in landscapes than in the human stories associated with English village life. His paintings typified late Victorian works that appealed to the social conscience in an age of rapid industrialisation, reform and economic hardship.’

Detail of "Evicted"

Detail of “Evicted”

The words ‘appealed to the social conscience’ were the key. This was the missing layer, the hidden extra, the further dimension that this painting offered. It was painted for a reason above and beyond the artist’s need to recreate that which appealed to his aesthetic senses. It was a statement designed to initiate change and I saw parallels with the songs of John Lennon, the writings of Harriet Beecher Stowe and all the works of ‘artists’ throughout the ages who have highlighted the suffering and injustices in society and on occasions offered solutions. This made me further think about the ‘artist’s’ role in initiating social change. I feel that simply because of what artists do their views in this arena are seen and heard most readily, stridently and often in extraordinarily attractive and powerful ways. This, I think, has resulted in society giving an unjustified importance to artists’ opinions and therefore granting them a licence, bordering on a monopoly, over the regulation of the social conscience. If this is true then it is a complete fallacy. We all must be and can be guardians of the social conscience and initiate social change by using whatever medium we are skilled at using.

The Kindertransport statue revisited

Every month, thousands of people read our post on the Kindertransport statue at Liverpool Street Station. I am in London for work. I decide to pay a visit to see how those five confused but proud children are doing.

Kindertransport 4

Previously unnoticed details catch my eye. Does the violin case mean there is a budding musical genius amonst them? I start to take more photographs. A lady in her eighties touches my arm. “They are beautiful aren’t they! I knew one of them. There were thousands of them: jewish children fleeing to England. It was years before that awful war.” I reply that indeed the bronze memorial is a very beautiful, poignant sculpture. “This is where I always meet my son” she continues. “We go for lunch!”

Kindertransport 5

The two girls, poised nevertheless, have stout shoes for their journey.

The elderly lady’s son, a well healed businessman, arrives. I overhear his first words after greeting his mother. “It makes me furious that people sit on it and leave their coffee cups!” Indeed, I have to remove some garbage before taking these photos. The problem is that this fabulous bronze monument, marking the point where the children arrived by train in London, is at the entrance to one of the city’s busiest stations and right outside McDonalds.

Kindertransport 6

The way Meisler has sculpted this girl’s right hand is masterful. The grip on the handle of the suitcase is loose and delicate. There is little weight in the case. It seems to imply that the children left their homes with only a few most valued possessions.

Kindertransport 7

Documenting Meisler’s attention to detail absorbs me. The pen clipped into the breast pocket of the boy’s tightly buttoned blazer speaks to learning and maybe academic potential. But again, those labels with numbers are chilling reminders of what was to come.

Kindertransport 8

I look up at this girl’s face. The image stays for the day. I hear a voice behind me. An academic-looking American arrives with a group of ten or so youngsters. “Here it is!” he says with an expansive gesture. “One of my masters students did her thesis about this statue!” He recounts the story of the Kindertransport to his charges.

A young man besuited-and-silk-tied  stands looking at the figures. He tells me he always stops here for a minute or so when passing through the station. He is a soldier. “It’s just incredible, what happened! I mean, unbelievable! It breaks me up!” I agree with him and tell him I am writing about the statue for a blog about beautiful stuff. He takes my card, shakes my hand firmly and strides away.

Kindertransport 9

In the ten minutes that it takes to snap these photos, I come to realise that, when it comes to sculpture in public places, the Kinderstransport statue is something of a celebrity. People are drawn to its beauty and to its story.

But reality is context. My last exchange is with a dishevelled youth with needle tracks in his forearms. He has had his wallet knicked and he needs ten pounds to get a train to go and see his mum! My money stays in my pocket. I point out that maybe it’s not the best place to peddle his hard luck story. “Whatever!” he says and wanders off.

Celebrity Beautiful Stuff: 2

The conversation goes something like this: “I was fascinated by the TBS post on celebrity beautiful stuff, Robin, but what about ******* ” I then have to admit that, whilst obviously recognising the name,  I didn’t know that ******* painted. The story of celebrity paintings continues… with some surprises!

Celebrity 6

Self portrait by Sylvester Stallone. Year unknown. Photo copyright bigpicturesphoto.com.

I am drawn to Sylvester Stallone’s paintings. They are a kind of raw reflection of the Rambo – Rocky people he has brought to the big screen. Biceps bulge. Abs abound. Just so macho! I love his little inserted symbols that combine male circle-arrow and clock face. Is this about his fear of masculinity diminishing with the passage of time? Despite all the testosterone, there is nevertheless a universal-lovey-heart symbol under the pumping left pectoral muscle! A masterly touch is the partial frame accentuating those big square world-saving shoulders.

Celebrity 7

Photo copyright: sneakymag.com.

Proof that it really is a self-portrait!

Celebrity 8

“Time Hands” by Sylvester Stallone. Year unknown. Photo copyright: Galerie Gmurzynska.

The critic who, on seeing Stallone’s paintings, said “Sly, keep the day job!” clearly didn’t realise that, first, Sly probably doesn’t need the day job, second, Sly has, in his own way, put his day job out there on canvas and, third, Sly sells his works for more than $45,000.

What does a moderately talented water-colourist have to do for his or her work to be the subject of a series of British postage stamps?

Celebrity 9

“Highgrove” by HRH Prince of Wales. Watercolour. Year unknown. Photocredit: AG Carrick.

Answer: be the next in line for the British throne!

Celebrity 10

Stamp series 1994 featuring water colours by HRH Prince of Wales.

Prince Charles has painted all his adult life. His work is accomplished, eye-comfortable and conservative. It’s not terribly imaginative. However, it’s good for stamps although I’d prefer an original Sly on my wall!

Whose rather dull paintings would you not want on your wall even though they sell at auction for $tens-of-thousands?

Celebrity 11

“The Courtyard of the Old Residency, Munich” by Adolf Hitler, 1914.

Yes, Adolf Hitler painted. He tried to get into art college as a youngster. He then thought about architecture but other career choices obviously presented themselves.

Celebrity 12

“Perchtoldsdorg Castle and Church” by Adolf Hitler, 1912.

In the previous post about celebrity beautiful stuff, I argued that celebrities’ paintings were worth more in financial terms precisely because they were done by celebrities. No other explanation needed. Would I want to own an original Hitler? No. Would I put a Hitler on my wall? No. But his paintings also command vast sums in the market place. Does this mean that notoreity does it for us just as well as celebrity?